You probably remember history of involving the casino in London while he had played to the punto banco? In that case, Phil Ivey had suspected cheat.
Today, another case of implies to another casino. Indeed, The New Jersey Law Journal we learns that the Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa in Atlantic City door complaint against and claimed it the sum of $ 9.6 million!
What is he seen? The "edge sorting". For more details on this topic, you can read the following more detailed article: what is the "edge sorting"?
He gets involved or not in these 2 cases, gain some thing, we bet it will be removed from the list of several casinos. As a reminder, in case that opposes it the Crockfords Casino, the casino still retains 7.8 million pounds which, in theory, are due.
For what is of 9, $6M that the Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa owes money must (should?) be deposited in Mexican bank account. That is why in this case, it is the casino lodging a complaint against.
It should be noted that before beginning its 4th session of Baccarat, casino submitted articles that accused him of fraud at the London casino (after several winning sessions, obviously). defended himself by stating that he did nothing wrong, that it had not been recognized guilty and that he would lodge a complaint against the casino in London. Branch therefore let him play again.
Phil Ivey has already admitted having used the "edge sorting" specifying that casinos had to do their job better. What do you think of this defence? Is - it legal? Morale? should it be blocking some of the gains or the fault back to the casinos that should have been better prepared?
PokerCollectif will keep you abreast of the development in this case.
In the meantime, you can discuss on our forums: the Borgata continues for 9. 6 M$
