According to an article by the Las Vegas Review-Journal, the former wife of Phil Ivey received his divorce a collection of handbags with a value of $ 1.2 million in addition to$ 1 million in jewelry. It is also an alimony of $ 180,000 per month. It is these details that were hitherto unknown to the general public when PokerCollectif had announced you the divorce of the great poker player.
As a reminder, at the end of the year 2009, Phil and Luciaetta divorced amicably. On the other hand, at the beginning of the year 2010, a $ 5000 donation made by Phil Ivey the judge who ruled on her divorce obviously had tongues wagging.
Luciaetta who discovered the existence of this a bit sleazy gift, had hired counsel Bruce Shapiro in March last to clarify this matter.
She has since filed a motion following June so that the divorce be revised. Counsel for Luciaetta, the divorce was not fair and Phil had apparently stopped to pay alimony since last April (month of black friday).
A judge subsequently decided in this case to reject the request of Ms. Ivey who took the case in Supreme Court in Nevada.
Later, Ms. Ivey has filed a motion with the Supreme Court of Nevada with intended to dismiss the Bill Gonzalez judge in charge of the divorce of the former spouses.
Phil Ivey lawyers comment today at the request of Ms. Ivey: "Luciaetta out of this divorce without any debt, with multi-million dollar property and alimony". In other words, Luciaetta would have no reason to complain of the judgment in her divorce.
Luciaetta complains about no longer receive pension, but that money came from Tiltware, the company behind Full Tilt Poker. Phil Ivey receives more money from Tiltware (for the reasons that it knows) and it is therefore logical that the pension will also, says counsel for Phil.
The judge was unfair in its favour or Luciaetta is it that a woman a little too ambitious?
Discuss this news on PokerCollectif forums: details of the divorce of Ivey (which cost him millions)
